liberal-economic arguments against political liberalism
Why am I against political liberalism
Because the political-liberalism is the contradiction of economic-liberalism.
Because in the political-liberalism the society pays for the choices of the individuals.
Because the individual freedoms are not followed by individual responsability.
Because the consequences of the choices of individuals are suffered for all the society.
Some flags of the political liberalism:
Why am I against the legalization of the drugs
Because the drugs market obey the supply and demand law.
Because if dont exist the consumer it will not exist the supplier.
Because the market of drugs, allowed and unallowed are direct or indirectly linked with the corruption, the organized crime, the violence and the accidents.
Because in last analysis, the user is the responsible for these bad things to the society.
Because the legalization of drugs its not followed by responsabilization politics.
Because the individual that use drugs and it does not answer for its acts and consequences.
Examples:
The smoker when discovers a lung cancer gets of the state ”free” treatment paid by the society.
The alcohol user when he has diagnosised a cirrhosis is dealt “free” with money of the society.
The user of injectable drugs who contracts virus HIV, receives treatment against the AIDS for “free” paid by the society.
Why am I against the legalizations of abortion
Because the woman decides to keep sexual relations without the contraceptive use of condoms or other methods, became pregant and go to a public hospital to practise the abortion for ”free” paid by society.
Because the free distribution of condoms is paid with money of the society.
Of the homosexual question
It does not interest me the sexual life of the individual, man or woman, hetero or homosexual, what the individual makes or leaves to make is his problem, not mine.
However, from the moment that such behavior results in consequences that harm the society of some form, economically or not, I am against.
Because the individual that keeps sexual relations without protection and contracts virus HIV, receives treatment against the AIDS for “free” paid by society.
Because all the sexually transmissible illnesses have treatment for “free” paid by society.
Because the distribution of condoms is for “free” paid with money of the society.
Because the sex change surggerys are offered for “free” paid by society.
Conclusion
I define myself as economically liberal, and would tend to politicial liberalism if the responsibility of these situations were only of the individuals, the society must not have to pay for the treatment of somebody that decided to make toxic substance use or if to place in risk situation.
However the direct and indirect consequences of the isolated action of individuals if make to feel in all, still that the such individuals paid the financial damage, this would be only part of this consequences; the corruption, the organized crime, the violence and the accidents still would reflect on all the society.
So the argument of that the individuals would only pay the consequences, really all is impossible to defend the right to the unrestricted individual freedom on the basis of the society suffers.
One sees therefore, that politic-liberalism is incompatible with economic-liberalism, although paradoxical, so that the freedom is kept of fact becomes necessary to keep a litles bit of conservative politics, not by the moral, ethical or religious convictions of the majority or whom make the laws, but for the proper question of the freedom, to guarantee the individual freedoms in the above express molds is to suppress the real freedom .
Finally ! Freedom without responsibility is freedom of ones few in detriment of the freedom of many !
Legalization of the drugs, legalization of the abortion, homosexual civil union, adoption for homosexuals, change sex surgery in public hospitals.
